童孟胜;张驰;张天航;钱登朝;康诚;吴珂;
TONG Mengsheng;ZHANG Chi;ZHANG Tianhang;QIAN Dengchao;KANG Cheng;WU Ke;Headquarters of Ninghai Major Traffic Project Construction;Ninghai Transport Bureau;College of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Zhejiang University;Wenzhou Highway Administration;

• 1:宁海县交通重点工程建设指挥部
• 2:宁海县交通运输局
• 3:浙江大学建筑工程学院
• 4:温州市公路管理局

摘要(Abstract)：

从视觉功效试验参数角度出发,分析USP、S、MOVE、MES2等中间视觉光度学模型计算结果的差异及成因,并讨论了各模型在隧道照明中的适用性。结果表明,在隧道中间段亮度水平范围内,四种中间视觉模型获得的亮度增益幅度为MOVE>MES2>S>USP。基于视觉功效的各中间视觉模型主要区别在于亮度适应系数x,有色差、高对比度和大偏心角的视觉任务会增大中间视觉函数Vm(λ)中暗视觉函数V'(λ)的权重;而无色差、低对比度和小偏心角的视觉任务会使得明视觉函数V(λ)的权重更大。隧道行车过程多为目标有色差、<5°偏心角和包含正负对比度的视觉任务,MOVE模型更适用于评价隧道中间段的人眼实际感受。
The present research analyzes the differences between the luminance calculated using the USP,S,MOVE,MES2 model and its causes,as well as discusses the applicability of each model in tunnel lighting from the perspective of visual conditions. Results show that in the interior zone of the tunnel,luminance calculated by MOVE ranks the highest,followed by MES2 and S model,and USP ranks the lowest. The major difference among visual performance based systems is adaptation coefficient x.Meanwhile,visual tasks with chromatic,high contrast and large eccentricity can enhance the weight of photopic function V( λ) in mesopic function Vm( λ); while visual tasks with achromatic,low contrast and small eccentricity can strengthen the weight of scotopic function V'( λ). The chromatic,eccentricity below 5 degrees, negative and positive contrast target is more frequently encountered in tunnel. Thus,MOVE model is more applicable to describe the actual vision in the tunnel driving environment.

关键词(KeyWords)： 隧道照明;中间视觉模型;视觉功效试验;光度学
tunnel lighting;mesopic models;vision function experiment;photometry

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 宁波市交通运输科技项目(201702);; 浙江省公路科技计划项目(2016-2-7)

作者(Authors): 童孟胜;张驰;张天航;钱登朝;康诚;吴珂;
TONG Mengsheng;ZHANG Chi;ZHANG Tianhang;QIAN Dengchao;KANG Cheng;WU Ke;Headquarters of Ninghai Major Traffic Project Construction;Ninghai Transport Bureau;College of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Zhejiang University;Wenzhou Highway Administration;

参考文献(References)：

• [1]王建平,严晓龙,徐晓冰.基于反应时间的中间视觉道路照明功率密度分析及显色性能研究[J].发光学报,2015,36(5):595-603.
• [2]梁波,崔璐璐,陈蔚,等.基于S/P值的隧道蓄反光侧壁材料辅助节能照明的光学性能试验研究[J].现代隧道技术,2016,53(6):196-201.
• [3]张晓芹,胡江碧,王猛,等.基于驾驶视认需求的隧道中间段路面亮度需求[J].北京工业大学学报,2016,42(5):768-773.
• [4]林燕丹,陈大华,邵红,等.中间视觉研究的动态及研究模式的剖析[J].照明工程学报,2002,13(4):9-13.
• [5]Recommended system for mesopic photometry based on visual performance:CIE 191:2010.
• [6]PALMER D A.The definition of a standard observer for mesopic photometry[J].Vision Research,1967,7(7):619-628.
• [7]IKEDA M,SHIMOZONO H.Mesopic luminous-efficiency functions[J].Journal of the Optical Society of America,1981,71(3):280.
• [8]徐晓冰,张勇,王建平,等.一种道路照明光源的光视光效模型研究[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,38(2):161-165.
• [9]杨勇,韩文元,严明,等.基于视觉功效法的公路照明光源性能分析[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2015,35(10):2686-2690.
• [10]杨勇,关丽,朱传征,等.中间视觉条件下光源光谱分布对人眼视亮度的影响[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2012,32(10):2629-2631.
• [11]杨超,范士娟.中间视觉对隧道照明的影响[J].华东交通大学学报,2013(1):22-25.
• [12]庄鹏.CIE中间视觉光度学模型的分析和应用[J].照明工程学报,2012,23(3):35-41.
• [13]HE Y.Evaluating light source efficacy under mesopic conditions using reaction times[J].Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society,1997,26:125-138.
• [14]REA M S,BULLOUGH J D,FREYSSINIER-NOVA J P,et al.A proposed unified system of photometry[J].Lighting Research&Technology,2004,36(2):85-109.
• [15]GOODMAN T,FORBES A,WALKEY H,et al.Mesopic visual efficiency IV:A model with relevance to nighttime driving and other applications[J].Lighting Research&Technology,2007,39(4):365-392.
• [16]VIIKARI M.Analysis of the existing visual performance based mesopic models and a proposal for the basis of mesopic photometry[R].Espoo:Helsinki University of Technology,Lighting Laboratory,2007,1-46.
• [17]赵炳强.驾驶员动态视觉特征及其影响[J].公路交通科技,1998(a01):102-104.
• [18]赖金星,张鹏,周慧,等.高速公路隧道交通事故规律研究[J].隧道建设,2017,37(1):37-42.
• [19]关雪峰,赵海天,胡姗姗.中间视觉条件下亮度对视力清晰度影响的“E”方法测定[J].照明工程学报,2010,21(3):17-24.